A Rather Useful Blog

My thoughts on current social and political issues.

Science 101 – Global Warming

I am more than stunned when I realize just how many armchair scientists there are in the world. Just read a comment thread about the latest and greatest news from the world of global warming. It’s amazing that folks who may not have picked up a science book since high school can have such a depth of knowledge about these complex issues. Mention the subject at the water cooler at work (are there any workplaces that still have water coolers?) and spirited debate will erupt. The guy in accounting knows what period of time must be examined to determine trending temperatures. The lady in R & D is most familiar with the degree of temperature fluctuation that signals a warming period or an ice age. And that amorphous dude in tech support has the calculations to prove/disprove anything you want about this social lightning rod.

Pssst. Here’s everything you need to know about global warming/climate change and how it will affect future generations: Nothing. Nada. Zip.

It’s not that it isn’t important. But people, our focus has to change. By developing agenda-driven issues that political animals can use to divide the electorate, we do a disservice to Mother Earth. It doesn’t matter what the final outcome of man-made pollution might be, the critical word here is final. And so, let’s do a little common sense walk-through.

Planet Earth came on the scene roughly 5 billion years ago. There is a fair amount of evidence that places man on the scene about 50,000 years ago. So from roughly 50,000 B.C. until about the start of the industrial revolution (let’s say around 1850 A.D.), there really was only a minimal amount of manmade pollution discharged into the air. Not very much at all. Now the unanswerable questions are: In the last 160 years, how many bazillion tons of pollutants has mankind unleashed upon his atmosphere? In the entire existence of man on the earth (50k+ years), what percentage of toxic gunk has made its way skyward in just the past 50 years? And are we really doing anything to reduce or mitigate our actions?

If we do nothing, the final questions in this common sense scenario are: Can man significantly alter an atmosphere in just a century or so that has been free of manmade pollution for the previous 500 centuries? And, putting aside the type of imagined consequence, can we admit that there really must be a price to pay? How much longer can mankind, with impunity, mess with the Earth’s air and water?

Common sense answer: Who knows? But sooner or later, the price will be exacted in some form.

Capitalism on Trial?

Presidential hopeful Herman Cain doesn’t think much of the Occupy Wall Street crowd because, he says, its members are un-American and against capitalism. But even though protesters around the country haven’t yet found their collective voice, it is safe to say they are a little closer to the truth than Herman Cain.

America is finally recognizing the incestuous fling going on between its politicians and their sugar daddy corporate benefactors. It is a simple and straightforward romance conducted in the bedroom of capitalism. Big business, spurred by greed and global competition in the marketplace, seeks ways to improve the corporate bottom line. Jobs are sent packing to other countries. Corners are cut in the production of goods that result in unsafe or downright dangerous products for the consumer. Commodity markets are manipulated. Books are cooked. Stocks rise and stockholders are rewarded. Executives are compensated for their unethical or criminal acts with obscene compensation packages – which often include massive amounts of company stock inflated by the very misdeeds of the corporate leaders who receive the loot.

America’s politicians are fully engaged in the process. The first act of any elected office holder in the U.S. is to begin raising money for his or her re-election, and global corporations are more than happy to back up the armored trucks to the congressional and White House loading docks. Billions of corporate dollars overtly and covertly find their way into election war chests. To encourage such “generosity,” elected officials must, at best, provide access to company executives, lawyers, and lobbyists. At worst, the relationship between corporations
and our elected officials is a simple exchange of money for influence and favorable treatment. It is the ultimate quid pro quo.

To acknowledge that capitalism is a flawed socio-economic system isn’t unpatriotic. It simply requires the courage to continually question and reflect upon the way we as Americans live our lives. It means shining a light into nooks and crannies where we might find distasteful truths. And upon finding flaws, as a country we can then set about finding ways to repair them. Capitalism isn’t immune from these examinations, even though it is regarded as a bedrock of our way of life.

The answer to the question of how we got here is admittedly complex and in some cases cyclical tracing back to the Great Depression. Much of the blame can be laid to the makers of public policy at the highest levels, and one name vaults to the forefront. Ronald Reagan was a corporate enabler of the worst kind. He didn’t really understand economics and so he adopted his policies from advice given by economic advisers. In his first term, the former president reduced a complex global economic scenario into a simplistic solution: Worship
at the altar of the free market. Do so, Reagan told us, and untold wealth would trickle down to the middle class and poor, beneficently directed by our captains of industry. But there was an important condition, Reagan told us. Government had to stay out of the way. Do away with most, if not all, government regulation of business, he  insisted. Corporate America was to be implicitly trusted to do the right thing. What followed has been decades of unflinching and relentless corporate shenanigans, misdeeds, greed, and outright crime. This is not a fact that will be noticed kindly nor with acceptance by those who have elevated Mr. Reagan to Mother Teresa status.

So if we are to be honest about our current version of capitalism and where it is headed, it is the American people who must work toward exposing the flaws and fixing them. This is where Occupy Wall Street comes into play. In its fledgling, inarticulate form, Occupy Wall Street has neither the savvy nor the political muscle to fix much of anything. But the group is at least turning on the light, and it is helping to begin a national conversation. Sometimes the dialogue isn’t pretty, as Mr. Cain and others have already demonstrated. Dismissing dissenters without listening to them usually isn’t a very good idea for anyone, let alone a potential leader of the free world. Mr. Cain not only dismissed the protesters, he insulted them.

By now, many of you will assume that I am a bleeding-heart liberal, out of touch with reality, and an apologist for big government and the current administration. You would then likely be surprised to learn that I neither advocate a new era of government regulation, nor do I harbor a general belief that government can solve all of our problems. The fact is that early in the 21st century, our government is bloated, ineffective, corrupt, and unresponsive to the citizenry. How could that sort of entity ever set about fixing anything, let alone a system in which it fully participates in the bedfellow politics of corporate malfeasance, misfeasance, and nonfeasance?

Now here is what really scares me. If big business won’t heal itself (I suspect the greed is far too embedded for that to happen), and if government can’t fix itself (not likely as long as the system rewards corruption with reelection), how can capitalism ever get a fair trial?

For a long time, I worshipped at the altar of the free market. I believed in Ronald Reagan’s theory of a trickle down economy. But 25 years later, the only thing I’ve noticed is something trickling on my leg.

Political Hypocrisy Reaching New Heights on Wall Street

So let me get this straight.

A group of concerned Americans band together to protest an unresponsive government where spending is out of control and elected officials are unresponsive to voters, and the group gets a name, national attention, plus lots of praise and pandering from Republican leaders. Thus the “tea party” is born. Today, these folks are patriots in the eyes of GOP leaders like Newt Gingrich, Eric Cantor, and presidential hopeful Herman Cain.

Fast forward a couple of years from the tea party’s coming out bash. A group of concerned Americans band together to protest an unresponsive political, economic, and social system, and the group gets a name and national attention. While the protesters are still finding a voice, “Occupy Wall Street,” is clearly fed up with decades of corporate greed and criminal activity. But wait, now there is neither praise nor pandering from Republicans. In fact, there is disdain and scathing criticism. Cantor calls the group ”mobs” that have pitted “Americans against Americans.” Appearing on CBS’ Face the Nation yesterday, Cain called the protesters “jealous” and said they were “playing the victim card.” Cain said the protesters wanted to “take somebody else’s” Cadillac.  Gingrich figured the demonstrations are President Obama’s fault, “a natural product of Obama’s class warfare.”

Really.

Maybe this is why the Republican party is in disarray these days in trying to find a candidate for the 2012 election. They think the American people are stupid and are incapable of detecting even the most blatant forms of hypocrisy. Don’t be tut-tutting these people Mr. Cain. They may be engaged voters who just might mobilize one day into an effective political arm, a la the tea party. And if that doesn’t happen Mr. Cain, it probably wouldn’t hurt to hide that Cadillac.

 

Hello world!

So here we go. Not that there is yet a “we,” for now simply an “I.”

I just finished my Master’s in Professional Writing at Towson University, and I figured I had better put it to some good use. And so, I have chosen to burden mankind (or at least a few masochists on WordPress) with my views on sociopoliticoeconomical issues. I think I just invented a word.

I am interested in politics and government, and I am a registered cynic and skeptic.

During less intense periods, I like to fish (freshwater). I kick ass in Fantasy Football. I enjoy a good movie. I get the senior discount at Bob Evans.

I’m happy to write. For anybody.

I hope you enjoy.

Post Navigation

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.